Auditing Standard No. 8 (2024)

The following auditing standard is not the current version and does not reflect any amendments effective on or after December 31, 2016. The current versionof the auditing standardscan be found here.

Effective Date: For audits of fiscal years beginning on or after Dec. 15, 2010

Final Rule: PCAOB Release No. 2010-004

Summary Table of Contents
  • (1) Introduction
  • (2) Objective
  • (3 - 11) Audit Risk

Introduction

1.This standard discusses the auditor's consideration of audit risk in an audit of financial statements as part of an integrated audit1/ or an audit of financial statements only.

Objective

2.The objective of the auditor is to conduct the audit of financial statements in a manner that reduces audit risk to an appropriately low level.

Audit Risk

3.To form an appropriate basis for expressing an opinion on the financial statements, the auditor must plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement2/ due to error or fraud. Reasonable assurance3/ is obtained by reducing audit risk to an appropriately low level through applying due professional care, including obtaining sufficient appropriate audit evidence.

4.In an audit of financial statements, audit risk is the risk that the auditor expresses an inappropriate audit opinion when the financial statements are materially misstated, i.e., the financial statements are not presented fairly in conformity with the applicable financial reporting framework. Audit risk is a function of the risk of material misstatement and detection risk.

Note: The auditor should look to the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission for the company under audit with respect to the accounting principles applicable to that company.

Risk of Material Misstatement

5.The risk of material misstatement refers to the risk that the financial statements are materially misstated. Auditing Standard No. 12, Identifying and Assessing Risks of Material Misstatement, indicates that the auditor should assess the risks of material misstatement at two levels: (1) at the financial statement level and (2) at the assertion4/ level.5/

6.Risks of material misstatement at the financial statement level relate pervasively to the financial statements as a whole and potentially affect many assertions. Risks of material misstatement at the financial statement level may be especially relevant to the auditor's consideration of the risk of material misstatement due to fraud. For example, an ineffective control environment, a lack of sufficient capital to continue operations, and declining conditions affecting the company's industry might create pressures or opportunities for management to manipulate the financial statements, leading to higher risk of material misstatement.

7.Risk of material misstatement at the assertion level consists of the following components:

  1. Inherent risk, which refers to the susceptibility of an assertion to a misstatement, due to error or fraud, that could be material, individually or in combination with other misstatements, before consideration of any related controls.
  2. Control risk, which is the risk that a misstatement due to error or fraud that could occur in an assertion and that could be material, individually or in combination with other misstatements, will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis by the company's internal control. Control risk is a function of the effectiveness of the design and operation of internal control.

8.Inherent risk and control risk are related to the company, its environment, and its internal control, and the auditor assesses those risks based on evidence he or she obtains. The auditor assesses inherent risk using information obtained from performing risk assessment procedures and considering the characteristics of the accounts and disclosures in the financial statements.6/ The auditor assesses control risk using evidence obtained from tests of controls (if the auditor plans to rely on those controls to assess control risk at less than maximum) and from other sources.7/

Detection Risk

9.In an audit of financial statements, detection risk is the risk that the procedures performed by the auditor will not detect a misstatement that exists and that could be material, individually or in combination with other misstatements. Detection risk is affected by (1) the effectiveness of the substantive procedures and (2) their application by the auditor, i.e., whether the procedures were performed with due professional care.

10.The auditor uses the assessed risk of material misstatement to determine the appropriate level of detection risk for a financial statement assertion. The higher the risk of material misstatement, the lower the level of detection risk needs to be in order to reduce audit risk to an appropriately low level.

11.The auditor reduces the level of detection risk through the nature, timing, and extent of the substantive procedures performed. As the appropriate level of detection risk decreases, the evidence from substantive procedures that the auditor should obtain increases.8/

1/ When the auditor is performing an integrated audit of financial statements and internal control over financial reporting, the requirements in Auditing Standard No. 5, An Audit of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting That Is Integrated with An Audit of Financial Statements, also apply. However, the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements are the same for both the audit of financial statements and the audit of internal control over financial reporting.

2/ Misstatement is defined in Appendix A of Auditing Standard No. 14, Evaluating Audit Results.

3/ See AU sec. 110, Responsibilities and Functions of the Independent Auditor, and paragraph .10 of AU sec. 230, Due Professional Care in the Performance of Work, for a further discussion of reasonable assurance.

4/ See Auditing Standard No. 15, Audit Evidence, for a description of financial statement assertions.

5/ Paragraph 59 of Auditing Standard No. 12.

6/ Paragraph 59.a. of Auditing Standard No. 12.

7/ Paragraphs 32-34 of Auditing Standard No. 13, The Auditor's Responses to the Risks of Material Misstatement.

8/ Paragraph 37 of Auditing Standard No. 13.

[Effective pursuant to SEC Release No. 34-63606, File No. PCAOB-2010-01 (December 23, 2010)]
Auditing Standard No. 8 (2024)

FAQs

What is the auditing standard number 8? ›

8. Inherent risk and control risk are related to the company, its environment, and its internal control, and the auditor assesses those risks based on evidence he or she obtains.

What is an acceptable level in auditing? ›

Acceptable audit risk is the auditor's level of risk that they are willing to accept to release an unqualified opinion on financial statements that can be materially misstated. Unqualified audit opinions state that financial statements are presumed to be free from material misstatements.

How do you pass an audit? ›

Let your tax attorney or CPA do the talking and remain friendly and non-confrontational through the audit. If you have to defend yourself, do so in a professional and unemotional manner. Let your documentation speak for itself. If you have done nothing wrong, you will pass an audit with flying colors.

Can audit risk be eliminated? ›

However, it's unlikely that an auditor can eliminate detection risk entirely, simply because most auditors will never be able to examine every single transaction that makes up a financial statement. Instead, auditors should aim to keep detection risk at an acceptable level.

What does the Accounting Standard 8 deal with? ›

8 Ind ASs set out accounting policies that result in financial statements containing relevant and reliable information about the transactions, other events and conditions to which they apply. Those policies need not be applied when the effect of applying them is immaterial.

What is the statement of financial accounting standards number 8? ›

An enterprise's financial statements shall not be adjusted for a rate change that occurs after the date of the financial statements or after the date of the foreign statements of a foreign operation that are consolidated or combined with or accounted for by the equity method in the financial statements of the ...

What is a failing audit score? ›

A failing score is defined as a score less than 70.0 in any of the seven divisions or a score less than 80.0 for the weighted average of all seven divisions. The audit score is a rating on a scale of 0 to 100—not a percentage. The use of 85 as the nominal score is arbitrary.

How to answer audit questions? ›

Honesty, sincerity, and straightforwardness should be the touchstones of your responses. An auditor is looking for the truth. A guess, even if it is an educated guess, is not the truth.

Do you pass or fail an audit? ›

You Can't Actually Fail an Audit

Audits aren't pass or fail, but we understand that you want a clean audit report so you can show off the strength of your security program.

What is acceptable audit risk? ›

Acceptable audit risk is the risk that the auditor is willing to take of giving an unqualified opinion when the financial statements are materially misstated. As acceptable audit risk increases, the auditor is willing to collect less evidence (inverse) and therefore accept a higher detection risk (direct).

What makes an audit high risk? ›

For example, an ineffective control environment, a lack of sufficient capital to continue operations, and declining conditions affecting the company's industry might create pressures or opportunities for management to manipulate the financial statements, leading to higher risk of material misstatement.

Can audit risk be zero? ›

Audit can never be zero-risk because auditors are human too | ICAEW.

What are the 8 es of operational auditing? ›

The 8 Es are effectiveness, efficiency, economy, excellence, ethics, equity, ecology, and emotion. Effectiveness is the process of evaluating the degree to which the organization, program, or process is achieving its goals and objectives.

What are the standards of IFRS 8? ›

IFRS 8 Operating Segments requires particular classes of entities (essentially those with publicly traded securities) to disclose information about their operating segments, products and services, the geographical areas in which they operate, and their major customers.

Why might auditors use the 8 E's? ›

The 8 Es provide a framework for auditors to focus on effectiveness, efficiency, economy, excellence, ethics, equity, ecology, and emotion. For each E, the document provides definitions and examples of what auditors should consider.

What is the audit standard? ›

Generally accepted auditing standards (GAAS) are a set of systematic guidelines used by auditors when conducting audits of companies' financial records. GAAS helps to ensure the accuracy, consistency, and verifiability of auditors' actions and reports.

References

Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Amb. Frankie Simonis

Last Updated:

Views: 5377

Rating: 4.6 / 5 (76 voted)

Reviews: 91% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Amb. Frankie Simonis

Birthday: 1998-02-19

Address: 64841 Delmar Isle, North Wiley, OR 74073

Phone: +17844167847676

Job: Forward IT Agent

Hobby: LARPing, Kitesurfing, Sewing, Digital arts, Sand art, Gardening, Dance

Introduction: My name is Amb. Frankie Simonis, I am a hilarious, enchanting, energetic, cooperative, innocent, cute, joyous person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.